The claim is that total savings of £198k
can be achieved and a substitute mobile library would be provided at about half
this cost. Unfortunately as you will be aware
finding a parking space near the shops in
The full paper giving all the details is available in the library or on the internet at:-
www.buckscc.gov.uk/libraries/review/index
A summary of the case to keep the libraries open is as follows.
The elderly and young will be badly impacted as the library at Iver Heath is not accessible by public transport.
The savings do not take account of the loss of income from rental of DVDs etc.
This is not a credible long term solution to funding problems.
More money is spent on central administration than on front line library staff.
Cambridgeshire were persuaded to keep their premises manned by volunteers so the full cost savings could not be realised.
This runs counter to Bucks County Council’s aim of “Getting closer to communities.”
The government wants to increase literacy standards.
Alan Oxley as your
How to register
your views
There is a petition against closure of
If you want to write a letter this will have more impact per individual than a signature on a petition. It is suggested that you write to:-
Margaret Dewar
Cabinet Member for Community Services
Bucks County Council
County Hall, Aylesbury
Bucks HP20 1UA
If you wish you could also send a copy to
Bob Strong, Head of Service (Library Review)
Libraries and Heritage
E mail rstrong@buckscc.gov.uk
Many thanks to Wendy Jenner who is organising the petition.
Perhaps better known as 106,


You will recall this was a site
compulsorily purchased by South Bucks DC from travellers that had got it into a
disgusting state (see bottom picture).
With funding of £23,700 from Living Spaces, support in kind from Bardons,
Simpsons, and money or materials from Bowdens, South Bucks DC,

Station car parking

Some time ago a few individuals tried to
stop residents parking on the strip of land between the station railway land
and
The Residents committee set out to determine who owned the land with a view to securing it for the ongoing benefit of the residents as a car parking area.
The land belonged to the Richings Park Estate Company and they attempted to sell it in 1934
The company no longer exists and this asset was not transferred to any new owner so we tried to claim adverse possession for the Residents Association. The land registry will not allow any such claim unless the land is fenced and secured such that only residents can use it. Since this is impractical we have abandoned the idea but we proposed to ensure that the land is kept open such that no one else can claim adverse possession. If you have any views please let a committee member know.